This isn’t some extreme view, it’s the foundation of our political system. Allow them to file suite if they feel that they are being mistreated. Mandate that the behavior of systems be inspectable and modifiable by consumers. When a large body of case law has been established, make certain practices (“dark patterns”) illegal and allow the companies and their developers to see fines, revocation of license, and jail time if they break the law (severity, etc accounted for by the justice system and due process). Here’s a better (more scalable) idea: open companies up to lawsuit if they break expectations, including of privacy but also of security.
#Ohio webwall code
They also do not function in a scalable way that can handle large amounts of code review (anyone on this blog should know how long that takes to do).Ĭalling for a regulatory body to do this is asking for the companies to regulate themselves. The problems that immediately become apparent are that regulatory bodies do not understand code. We’re asking for regulatory bodies to please constrain what private companies do with secret code.
#Ohio webwall software
This is the ultimate indication that Free Software has failed. Tags: Internet of Things, marketing, privacy, sensors, surveillance, web privacy Which means government needs to prioritize security over their own surveillance needs. Government needs to step in and regulate businesses down to reasonable practices. We’ve long passed the point where ordinary people have any technical understanding of the different ways networked computers violate their privacy. The Internet of Things is the Internet of sensors, and the Internet of surveillance. This kind of thing is going to happen more and more, in all sorts of areas of our lives. A complaint on those grounds, Calo said, “would not be laughed out of court.” Calo said it could violate a federal law against unfair and deceptive practices, as well as laws against deceptive trade practices in California and Massachusetts. In yesterday’s report on Acurian Health, University of Washington law professor Ryan Calo told Gizmodo that giving users a “send” or “submit” button, but then sending the entered information regardless of whether the button is pressed or not, clearly violates a user’s expectation of what will happen. This is important because it goes against what people expect: That way, the company would have it even if those people immediately changed their minds and closed the page. Using Javascript, those sites were transmitting information from people as soon as they typed or auto-filled it into an online form. …we discovered NaviStone’s code on sites run by Acurian, Quicken Loans, a continuing education center, a clothing store for plus-sized women, and a host of other retailers. Websites are sending information prematurely:
Websites Grabbing User-Form Data Before It's Submitted
0 kommentar(er)
